#COCOASPELL MAC SOFTWARE#
and you see the previous version still!), so the software was changed to simply tell browsers not to cache. There were (some months ago) significant problems with old versions of pages getting 'stuck' in IE browser caches (eg edit a page, hit save, you're sent back to the page. What is the cause of that, and can I do something about that? - Patrick 03:41 (UTC) I can only save them one by one during surfing, not afterwards. However, of wikipedia articles only the graphic files are stored.
When I have been surfing the web and I want to keep the web pages I have seen, I can copy them from the IE-cache. See m: technical issues for a list of browsers that are known to work or not work correctly with the UTF-8 encoded wikis (meta, Japanese, Chinese, Russian, Esperanto and post-conversion Polish, Hebrew, Arabic, etc.) As for the mystery logouts when using multiple wikis, I can only say that I've never had a problem with Mozilla which I use regularly, nor with intermittent tests on Internet Explorer 5.5 (W2k) or Konqueror 2.2.0. ), just to add a magic link, is that safe for me to use Opera or would I damage the page ? if I go to the japanese (or russian, or.when one wiki doesnot recognise me while I jump through magic links, is that me or my browser ?.If I am 50% of my time on the fr:, 30% on the en:, 10% on the m: and 10: on the german, which browser should I use (or not use) ?.But I'd like a page to answer these questions You're probably right each wiki needs one page on its own. Is it me or my browser? Ortolan88 PS - for such practical purposes, each language of wikipedia should have its own version of this page. There could be something more elaborate and "meta" on meta, referenced from here, but I'd like this page to answer the question:
The idea is practical usefulness and I think the Wikipedia namespace is the right home for that. If it were on meta, no one would ever see it. If you stay on the same wiki all the time, life is *good* :-) However, Netscape is not a good choice either on the meta, where it tends to add weird spaces in the text. But must then change my settings, as it doesnot support the cologne settings (overlapping text and quick bar). When the page is too long, I switch to Netscape. However, it is a disastrous choice for the meta, as it destroys all the special characters. It is also the best choice when I jump on the fr.wiki. However I cannot use it when a page is too long, since it is cutting it in parts. Some browsers work well on the en, but not at all on the meta for example.Įxemple : My best choice on the en.wiki is Opera. This page would be best on meta.for the different wikipedias are not encoded the same way. Vladimír Fuka 20:51, 2 December 2005 (UTC) Reply I see /small tags in Firefox 1.5.0 under Linux, see
0 kommentar(er)
